Benchmark Study of Image Quality with Saliency-Guided Compression in Mobile Streaming Platforms

Authors

  • Jacob E. Sanders Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA Author

Keywords:

Saliency-Guided Compression, Image Quality Assessment, Mobile Streaming, Visual Attention, Quality of Experience

Abstract

The exponential proliferation of mobile streaming platforms has precipitated an unprecedented demand for efficient image and video compression techniques that can operate effectively under constrained bandwidth conditions while preserving the optimal human visual experience. Traditional compression algorithms often apply uniform degradation across the entire visual frame, fundamentally ignoring the physiological and psychological realities of human visual perception, wherein certain regions inherently attract disproportionate gaze fixation. Consequently, saliency guided compression has emerged as a promising paradigm, dynamically allocating bitrates to regions of high visual interest at the expense of peripheral background elements. However, the subsequent evaluation of visual fidelity in such heterogeneously compressed media presents a formidable challenge to conventional objective quality assessment metrics. This paper comprehensively investigates the prediction of image quality derived from saliency guided compression methodologies through a large scale benchmark study specifically tailored for mobile streaming environments. By constructing an extensive dataset encompassing a diverse array of source images subjected to spatially variant quantization, this research systematically evaluates the correlation between subjective human mean opinion scores and an array of sophisticated objective quality predictors. The primary objective is to elucidate the mechanisms by which saliency weighting influences perceived degradation and to establish an optimized algorithmic framework for predicting end user satisfaction. Extensive empirical analysis reveals that traditional full reference metrics consistently miscalculate the perceptual severity of peripheral artifacts, whereas newly proposed saliency integrated predictive models exhibit remarkably higher statistical correlation with human perception. Ultimately, this research provides vital theoretical foundations and practical guidelines for optimizing mobile media delivery architectures.

References

1. Raheel, A.; Majid, M.; Alnowami, M.; Anwar, S.M. Physiological sensors based emotion recognition while experiencing tactile enhanced multimedia. Sensors 2020, 20, 4037.

2. Qian, L.; Luo, Z.; Du, Y.; Guo, L. Cloud Computing: An Overview. In Cloud Computing; Jaatun, M.G., Zhao, G., Rong, C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 626–631.

3. Cáceres, J.; Vaquero, L.M.; Rodero-Merino, L.; Polo, Á.; Hierro, J.J. Service Scalability Over the Cloud. In Handbook of Cloud Computing; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 357–377.

4. Arpaia, I.; Manna, C.; Montenero, G.; D’Addio, G. In-time prognosis based on swarm intelligence for home-care monitoring: A case study on pulmonary disease. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 692–698.

5. The Kubernetes Authors. Kubernetes: Production-Grade Container Orchestration. Available online: https://kubernetes.io/ (accessed on 30 March 2026).

6. Amazon Web Services, Inc. Fully Managed Container Solution—Amazon Elastic Container Service. Available online: https://aws.amazon.com/ecs (accessed on 30 March 2026).

7. Amazon Web Services, Inc. Serverless Function, Faas Serverless—AWS Lambda. Available online: https://aws.amazon.com/lambda (accessed on 30 March 2026).

8. Huang, C.; Huang, Y.; Feng, J.; Liang, S.; Yan, M.; Wu, J. LACE: Mitigating cold-starts in serverless with a multi-task mixture-of-experts caching. J. King Saud. Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2026, 38, 93.

9. Nguyen, H.; Tran, N.; Nguyen, H.D.; Nguyen, L.; Kotani, K. KTFEv2: Multimodal facial emotion database and its analysis. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 17811–17822.

10. James, A.P.; Dasarathy, B.V. Medical image fusion: A survey of the state of the art. Inf. Fusion 2014, 19, 4–19.

11. The Gunicorn Authors. Gunicorn: Python WSGI HTTP Server for UNIX. Available online: https://gunicorn.org/ (accessed on 30 March 2026).

12. Amazon Web Services, Inc. Amazon ECS clusters—Amazon Elastic Container Service. Available online: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonECS/latest/developerguide/clusters.html (accessed on 30 March 2026).

13. Apache Software Foundation. Apache JMeterTM. Available online: https://jmeter.apache.org/ (accessed on 30 March 2026).

14. Shen, L.; Lang, B.; Song, Z. Infrared object detection method based on DBD-YOLOv8. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 145853–145868.

15. Amazon Web Services, Inc. APM Tool—Amazon CloudWatch. Available online: https://aws.amazon.com/cloudwatch/ (accessed on 30 March 2026).

16. Amazon Web Services, Inc. Amazon EC2 On-Demand Pricing. Available online: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/on-demand/ (accessed on 30 March 2026).

17. Deevi, S.A.; Lee, C.; Gan, L.; Nagesh, S.; Pandey, G.; Chung, S.-J. RGB-X object detection via scene-specific fusion modules. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 7366–7375.

18. Bebis, G.; Gyaourova, A.; Singh, S.; Pavlidis, I. Face recognition by fusing thermal infrared and visible imagery. Image Vis. Comput. 2006, 24, 727–742.

19. Ghassemian, H. A review of remote sensing image fusion methods. Inf. Fusion 2016, 32, 75–89.

20. Rattá, G.; Vega, J.; Murari, A.; Contributors, J. Image fusion: Advances in the state of the art. Inf. Fusion 2007, 8, 114–118.

21. Boeing, G. OSMnx: New methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2017, 65, 126–139.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-29

Issue

Section

Articles