Generative Image Priors for Artifact Suppression in Low-Dose CT Scans: Simulation Study

Authors

  • Anna Leppänen Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland Author

Keywords:

Generative Image Priors, Artifact Suppression, Low-Dose CT, Image Reconstruction, Simulation Study

Abstract

The widespread utilization of computed tomography in clinical diagnostics has brought immense benefits to patient care, yet the associated ionizing radiation poses non-negligible long-term health risks. Consequently, the transition toward low dose computed tomography has become an urgent clinical imperative, guided by the principle of keeping radiation doses as low as reasonably achievable. However, reducing the radiation dose intrinsically leads to severe degradation in image quality, primarily manifested as excessive quantum mottle, electronic noise, and complex streak artifacts resulting from photon starvation. Traditional analytical and iterative reconstruction methods often struggle to strike an optimal balance between aggressive noise reduction and the preservation of crucial anatomical details. In recent years, data-driven approaches, particularly those leveraging deep learning, have demonstrated remarkable potential in addressing these inverse problems. Among these, generative image priors derived from unsupervised generative models have emerged as highly promising tools, offering powerful regularization capabilities without relying on strictly paired training data. This paper presents a comprehensive simulation study investigating the efficacy of generative image priors in suppressing artifacts and restoring image fidelity in low dose computed tomography scans. By simulating a rigorous forward projection model incorporating realistic noise characteristics, we evaluate an iterative reconstruction framework guided by a score-based generative prior. Extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms conventional techniques in mitigating streak artifacts, preserving high-frequency structural edges, and maintaining natural image textures.

References

1. Yin, Y.; Gao, B.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.; Xie, D.; Liu, Y.; Wang, C. Soil organic matter mapping in complex terrains considering spatial heterogeneity. Environ. Model. Softw. 2025, 192, 106569.

2. Cang, R.; Li, H.; Yao, H.; Jiao, Y.; Ren, Y. Improving Direct Physical Properties Prediction of Heterogeneous Materials from Imaging Data via Convolutional Neural Network and a Morphology-Aware Generative Model. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018, 150, 212–221.

3. He, K.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 June 2016; pp. 770–778.

4. Dong, C.; Huang, L.; Xiong, C.; Li, M.; Tang, J. Evaluation of quality of baguette bread using image analysis technique. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2025, 140, 107222.

5. Honarmandi, P.; Attari, V.; Arroyave, R. Accelerated Materials Design Using Batch Bayesian Optimization: A Case Study for Solving the Inverse Problem from Materials Microstructure to Process Specification. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2022, 210, 111417.

6. Paul, S.S.; Coops, N.C.; Johnson, M.S.; Krzic, M.; Smukler, S.M. Evaluating sampling efforts of standard laboratory analysis and mid-infrared spectroscopy for cost effective digital soil mapping at field scale. Geoderma 2019, 356, 113925.

7. Alhatami, E.; Huang, M.; Bhatti, U.A.; Bhatti, U.A. Chapter 14—Remote sensing image fusion based on deep learning and convolutional neural network technique. In Deep Learning for Earth Observation and Climate Monitoring; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2025; pp. 265–277. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780443247125000166 (accessed on 21 May 2026).

8. Khan, A.; Sohail, A.; Zahoora, U.; Qureshi, A.S. A survey of the recent architectures of deep convolutional neural networks. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2020, 53, 5455–5516.

9. López, O.A.M.; López, A.M.; Crossa, J. Fundamentals of Artificial Neural Networks and Deep Learning. In Multivariate Statistical Machine Learning Methods for Genomic Prediction; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 379–425.

10. Elnabawi, M.H.; Hamza, N. A Methodology of Creating a Synthetic, Urban-Specific Weather Dataset Using a Microclimate Model for Building Energy Modelling. Buildings 2022, 12, 1407.

11. Yu, Y.; Li, X.; Hsu, A.; Kittner, N. Mapping Spatiotemporal Disparities in Residential Electricity Inequality Using Machine Learning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 19999–20008.

12. Lamberts, R.; Hensen, J.L. Building Performance Simulation for Design and Operation; Spoon Press: London, UK, 2011; ISBN 0-415-47414-0.

13. Worthy, A.; Ashayeri, M.; Marshall, J.; Abbasabadi, N. Bridging the Simulation-to-Reality Gap: A Comprehensive Review of Microclimate Integration in Urban Building Energy Modeling (UBEM). Energy Build. 2025, 331, 115392.

14. Noh, H.; Na, G.S.; Lee, N.; Park, C. MSP-LLM: A Unified Large Language Model Framework for Complete Material Synthesis Planning. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2602.07543.

15. Ashayeri, M.; Abbasabadi, N.; Heidarinejad, M.; Stephens, B. Predicting Intraurban PM2.5 Concentrations Using Enhanced Machine Learning Approaches and Incorporating Human Activity Patterns. Environ. Res. 2021, 196, 110423.

16. Krizhevsky, A.; Sutskever, I.; Hinton, G.E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Lake Tahoe, NV, USA, 3–6 December 2012; Volume 25, pp. 1097–1105.

17. Yang, Z.; Yabansu, Y.C.; Al-Bahrani, R.; Liao, W.-K.; Choudhary, A.N.; Kalidindi, S.R.; Agrawal, A. Deep Learning Approaches for Mining Structure-Property Linkages in High Contrast Composites from Simulation Datasets. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018, 151, 278–287.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-16

Issue

Section

Articles