Depth Estimation Networks for Navigation Safety in Indoor Robot Mapping
Keywords:
Depth Estimation, Indoor Mapping, Navigation Safety, Simulation Study, Computer VisionAbstract
The deployment of autonomous mobile robots in complex indoor environments relies heavily on robust perception systems to construct accurate maps and navigate without collisions. Monocular depth estimation networks have emerged as a prominent solution due to their low cost and spatial efficiency, yet their susceptibility to visual artifacts often compromises navigational safety. This paper presents a comprehensive simulation study focused on predicting navigation safety directly from the outputs of depth estimation networks during indoor robot mapping. By leveraging a highly realistic simulation environment, the research systematically evaluates how depth estimation errors correlate with imminent collision risks and mapping inaccuracies. A novel predictive framework is introduced, which analyzes spatial inconsistencies and confidence metrics generated by the neural network to forecast safety scores before the robot executes its trajectory. The methodology involves an extensive dataset generated within the simulation, capturing diverse lighting conditions, structural complexities, and dynamic obstacles. Analysis of the simulation results demonstrates that integrating a safety prediction module significantly reduces collision rates and improves overall mapping fidelity. This research bridges the gap between purely vision-based perception and safe motion planning, offering a scalable approach for evaluating and enhancing robotic navigation systems in a controlled, risk-free environment. The findings underscore the critical importance of uncertainty quantification in deep learning models applied to safety-critical domains.References
1. Kousis, I.; Manni, M.; Pisello, A.L. Environmental Mobile Monitoring of Urban Microclimates: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 169, 112847.
2. Were, K.; Bui, D.T.; Dick, Ø.B.; Singh, B.R. A comparative assessment of support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests for predicting and mapping soil organic carbon stocks across an Afromontane landscape. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 52, 394–403.
3. Miao, T.; Ji, W.; Li, B.; Zhu, X.; Yin, J.; Yang, J.; Huang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Yao, D.; Kong, X. Advanced Soil Organic Matter Prediction with a Regional Soil NIR Spectral Library Using Long ShortTerm Memory–Convolutional Neural Networks: A Case Study. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1256.
4. Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, J. Application of a Fusion Attention Mechanism-Based Model Combining Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Units and Recurrent Neural Networks in Soil Nutrient Content Estimation. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2724.
5. Tan, M.; Le, Q. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Long Beach, CA, USA, 9–15 June 2019; PMLR: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 6105–6114.
6. Shi, Y.; Wei, P.; Feng, K.; Feng, D.C.; Beer, M. A survey on machine learning approaches for uncertainty quantification of engineering systems. Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2025, 1, 11.
7. Xiong, Z.; Cui, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, M.; Hu, J. Evaluating Explorative Prediction Power of Machine Learning Algorithms for Materials Discovery Usingk-Fold Forward Cross-Validation. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2020, 171, 109203.
8. Haralick, R.M.; Shanmugam, K.; Dinstein, I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 1973, SMC-3, 610–621.
9. Olakanmi, S.J.; Jayas, D.S.; Paliwal, J. Applications of imaging systems for the assessment of quality characteristics of bread and other baked goods: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 1817–1838.
10. Louis, S.-Y.; Zhao, Y.; Nasiri, A.; Wang, X.; Song, Y.; Liu, F.; Hu, J. Graph Convolutional Neural Networks with Global Attention for Improved Materials Property Prediction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 18141–18148.
11. Fan, X.; Zhang, M.; Mujumdar, A.S. Intelligent food processing: Journey from artificial neural network to deep learning. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 399–440.
12. da Silva Cotrim, W.; Minim, V.P.R.; Felix, L.B.; Minim, L.A. Short convolutional neural networks applied to the recognition of the browning stages of bread crust. J. Food Eng. 2020, 277, 109916.
13. Honorato, M.; Coelho, A.P.; Fernandes, C.; Matheus, S.; Claudia, M. Estimation of soil organic matter content by modeling with artificial neural networks. Geoderma 2019, 350, 46–51.
14. Piñeiro-Juncal, N.; Mateo, M.Á.; Leiva-Dueñas, C.; Serrano, E.; Inostroza, K.; Soler, M.; Apostolaki, E.T.; Lavery, P.; Duarte, C.M.; Lafratta, A.; et al. Soil organic carbon depth profiles and centennial and millennial decay rates in tidal marsh, mangrove and seagrass blue carbon ecosystems. Commun. Earth Environ. 2025, 6, 504.
15. Ng, W.; Minasny, B.; Jeon, S.H.; McBratney, A. Mid-infrared spectroscopy for accurate measurement of an extensive set of soil properties for assessing soil functions. Soil Secur. 2022, 6, 100043.
16. Narayanan, A.; Verma, S.; Ramadan, E.; Babaie, P.; Zhang, Z.L. DeepCache: A Deep Learning Based Framework For Content Caching. In Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Network Meets AI & ML, Budapest, Hungary, 24 August 2018; pp. 48–53.
17. Dong, W.; Liu, G.; Yu, J.; Hu, W.; Liu, X. SFDC: File Access Pattern Aware Cache Framework for High-performance Computer. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 17th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, 2015 IEEE 7th International Symposium on Cyberspace Safety and Security, and 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems, New York, NY, USA, 24–26 August 2015; pp. 342–350.
18. Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 August 2016; pp. 785–794.
19. Emadi, M.; Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R.; Cherati, A.; Danesh, M.; Mosavi, A.; Scholten, T. Predicting and Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Northern Iran. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2234.
20. Chinilin, A.; Savin, I.Y. Combining machine learning and environmental covariates for mapping of organic carbon in soils of Russia. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 2023, 26, 666–675.
21. Li, Y.; Feng, H. Integrating Urban Building Energy Modeling (UBEM) and Urban-Building Environmental Impact Assessment (UB-EIA) for Sustainable Urban Development: A Comprehensive Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 213, 115471.
22. John, K.; Abraham Isong, I.; Michael Kebonye, N.; Okon Ayito, E.; Chapman Agyeman, P.; Marcus Afu, S. Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Estimate Soil Organic Carbon Variability with Environmental Variables and Soil Nutrient Indicators in an Alluvial Soil. Land 2020, 9, 487.
23. Bhattoo, R.; Bishnoi, S.; Zaki, M.; Krishnan, N.M.A. Understanding the Compositional Control on Electrical, Mechanical, Optical, and Physical Properties of Inorganic Glasses with Interpretable Machine Learning. Acta Mater. 2023, 242, 118439.
24. Willmott, C.; Matsuura, K. Advantages of the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) over the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in Assessing Average Model Performance. Clim. Res. 2005, 30, 79.
25. Chen, X.; Yang, J. Urban Climate Monitoring Network Design: Existing Issues and a Cluster-Based Solution. Build. Environ. 2022, 214, 108959.
26. Brenning, A. Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: Review, comparison and evaluation. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2005, 5, 853–862.
27. Franjic, D.; Schweikert, K. Predictor Preselection for Mixed-Frequency Dynamic Factor Models: A Simulation Study with an Empirical Application to GDP Nowcasting. J. Forecast. 2025, 44, 255–269.
28. Pacci, S.; Dengiz, O.; Alaboz, P.; Saygın, F. Artificial neural networks in soil quality prediction: Significance for sustainable tea cultivation. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 947, 174447.
29. Guo, P.T.; Wu, W.; Sheng, Q.; Li, M.F.; Liu, H.; Wang, Z.Y. Prediction of soil organic matter using artificial neural network and topographic indicators in hilly areas. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2013, 95, 333–344.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.