Relationship of Synthetic Training Images and Data Governance to Detection Robustness in Agricultural Drone Surveys

Authors

  • Haruka Morita Department of Aerospace Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan Author
  • Miyu Miura Department of Aerospace Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan Author

Keywords:

Precision Agriculture, Synthetic Data, Data Governance, Object Detection, Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles

Abstract

The integration of uncrewed aerial vehicles and advanced computer vision systems has revolutionized precision agriculture, enabling high-resolution crop monitoring and targeted resource management. However, the robustness of object detection models deployed in these systems is frequently compromised by environmental variability, data scarcity, and inconsistent annotation practices. This paper explores the dual role of synthetic training images and comprehensive data governance frameworks in enhancing detection robustness for agricultural drone surveys. By leveraging procedurally generated crop models and sophisticated rendering engines, we construct highly variable synthetic datasets that simulate a wide spectrum of lighting conditions, occlusion scenarios, and weather phenomena. Concurrently, we introduce a stringent data governance protocol that standardizes metadata schemas, enforces quality assurance, and mitigates domain bias across both real and synthetic data pipelines. Through extensive experimental evaluation, we demonstrate that the strategic amalgamation of synthetic imagery with governed data management significantly improves the generalization capabilities of deep learning detectors across unseen agricultural environments. The findings suggest that relying solely on algorithmic improvements is insufficient for achieving field-ready reliability; instead, a holistic approach prioritizing data quality, diversity, and traceability is essential.

References

1. Țopa, D.C.; Căpșună, S.; Calistru, A.E.; Ailincăi, C. Sustainable Practices for Enhancing Soil Health and Crop Quality in Modern Agriculture: A Review. Agriculture 2025, 15, 998.

2. Chu, B.; Qureshi, S. Comparing out-of-sample performance of machine learning methods to forecast US GDP growth. Comput. Econ. 2023, 62, 1567–1609.

3. Yang, Y.; Gu, Q.; Wei, H.; Liu, H.; Wang, W.; Wei, S. Transforming and Validating Urban Microclimate Data with Multi-Sourced Microclimate Datasets for Building Energy Modelling at Urban Scale. Energy Build. 2023, 295, 113318.

4. Du, C.-J.; Sun, D.-W. Learning techniques used in computer vision for food quality evaluation: A review. J. Food Eng. 2006, 72, 39–55.

5. Lyngby, P.; Thygesen, K.S. Data-Driven Discovery of 2D Materials by Deep Generative Models. npj Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 232.

6. Guo, L.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, M.; Cheng, P.; He, P.; Li, L.; Ding, D.; Liu, C.; Muga, F.C.; Kamal, M.; et al. Soil Organic Matter Content Prediction Using Multi-Input Convolutional Neural Network Based on Multi-Source Information Fusion. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1313.

7. Potu, S.T.; Niranjan Murthy, R.; Thomas, A.; Mishra, L.; Prange, N.; Durmaz, A.R. Ontology-Conformal Recognition of Materials Entities Using Language Models. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 18597.

8. Belady, L.A. A study of replacement algorithms for a virtual-storage computer. IBM Syst. J. 1966, 5, 78–101.

9. Brosnan, T.; Sun, D.-W. Improving quality inspection of food products by computer vision—a review. J. Food Eng. 2004, 61, 3–16.

10. Sandler, M.; Howard, A.; Zhu, M.; Zhmoginov, A.; Chen, L.-C. MobileNetV2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–23 June 2018; pp. 4510–4520.

11. Hsu, A.; Sheriff, G.; Chakraborty, T.; Manya, D. Disproportionate Exposure to Urban Heat Island Intensity across Major US Cities. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2721.

12. NLCD 2021: USGS National Land Cover Database, 2021 Release|Earth Engine Data Catalog. Available online: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/USGS_NLCD_RELEASES_2021_REL_NLCD (accessed on 30 July 2024).

13. NASADEM: NASA NASADEM Digital Elevation 30m|Earth Engine Data Catalog. Available online: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/NASA_NASADEM_HGT_001 (accessed on 30 July 2024).

14. USFS Tree Canopy Cover V2021-4 (CONUS and OCONUS)|Earth Engine Data Catalog. Available online: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/USGS_NLCD_RELEASES_2021_REL_TCC_v2021-4 (accessed on 8 August 2024).

15. Rajagopal, P.; Priya, R.S.; Senthil, R. A Review of Recent Developments in the Impact of Environmental Measures on Urban Heat Island. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 88, 104279.

16. Greve, M.H.; Kheir, R.B.; Greve, M.B.; Bøcher, P.K. Quantifying the ability of environmental parameters to predict soil texture fractions using regression-tree model with GIS and LIDAR data: The case study of Denmark. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 18, 1–10.

17. Abbasabadi, N.; Ashayeri, M. Socioeconomic Determinants of Public Health and Residential Building Energy Use in Chicago. In Proceedings of the UIA 2021 RIO: 27th World Congress of Architects; The Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA): Washington, DC, USA, 2021; pp. 707–713.

18. Chicco, D.; Warrens, M.J.; Jurman, G. The Coefficient of Determination R-Squared Is More Informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in Regression Analysis Evaluation. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2021, 7.

19. Canny, J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1986, PAMI-8, 679–698.

20. Amoli, M.G.; Hasanlou, M.; Samadzadegan, F.; Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R.; Dadrass Javan, F. Estimating soil organic carbon using time series Band 11 (SWIR) of multispectral Sentinel-2 satellite images and machine learning algorithms. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2025, 40, 101736.

21. Excell, L.E.; Jain, R.K. Examining the Impact of Energy Efficiency Retrofits and Vegetation on Energy Performance of Institutional Buildings: An Equity-Driven Analysis. Appl. Energy 2024, 357, 121722.

22. Krelling, A.F.; Lamberts, R.; Malik, J.; Zhang, W.; Sun, K.; Hong, T. Defining Weather Scenarios for Simulation-Based Assessment of Thermal Resilience of Buildings under Current and Future Climates: A Case Study in Brazil. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 107, 105460.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-16

Issue

Section

Articles